DNS Test from Romania
2 nodes in Bacău, Bucharest · RONIX Bucharest
Romania — 2 Nodes
DNS Testing from Romania
A DNS check from Romania queries your domain's authoritative nameservers from our Bucharest or Bacău node and records the response. This verifies DNS propagation has reached Romanian infrastructure, or confirms that your GeoDNS policy returns the correct record for Romanian users. The probe queries authoritative servers directly, not recursive resolvers, so it shows the current authoritative record rather than a potentially cached response.
Romanian ISPs operate their own recursive resolvers. RCS&RDS runs a widely-used national resolver, and many users additionally use Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) or Google (8.8.8.8). If you use GeoDNS and want to confirm which record Romanian users receive, our probes show what an authoritative query from AS200651 (Bucharest) or AS214062 (Bacău) returns. Romanian IPs are usually correctly mapped to EU zones in major GeoDNS providers, but northeastern Romania near the Moldovan border is occasionally miscategorized in smaller GeoDNS databases.
DNS propagation in Romania follows standard TTL behavior. If a DNS check from our Romanian nodes returns a stale record after TTL expiry, the authoritative nameserver is the first place to investigate. The Bacău node in northeastern Romania provides an additional data point — if it returns a different record than the Bucharest node for the same domain, your GeoDNS policy may be applying different regional rules to the two ASNs used by our probes, which is worth verifying if you are targeting Romanian users with a specific record.
Romania Network Infrastructure
Bucharest is the center of Romanian internet infrastructure. RONIX and InterLAN are the primary internet exchanges, with Equinix also operating a colocation and peering facility in the city. Romania has one of the highest average broadband speeds in Europe — consistently ranking in the top five for fixed broadband download speeds in EU comparisons. This is partly due to early investment in fiber-to-the-home by smaller competitive ISPs in urban areas, which created a dense fiber market before large incumbents dominated.
The major Romanian ISPs include RCS&RDS (AS8708), which is the largest broadband provider and operates a national fiber backbone, Orange Romania (AS9050), Telekom Romania (AS8953), and UPC Romania (AS6830, now Vodafone). RCS&RDS is particularly notable from a network perspective — it peers aggressively at European IXPs and has built transit infrastructure that competes with incumbents across the region. Its AS8708 appears frequently in traceroutes through Romania and neighboring countries.
InterLAN operates both an IX and carrier-neutral datacenter infrastructure in Bucharest. Equinix's Bucharest facility brought a globally recognized neutral colocation brand to the Romanian market and connects to Equinix's European fabric. These facilities have attracted regional hosting operators and CDN edge nodes, improving local content delivery for Romanian users and reducing reliance on Frankfurt or Vienna for content that was previously served from further west.
Bucharest's geographic position gives it reasonable latency to several important neighboring cities. Sofia is around 15 ms away, Budapest is roughly 20 ms, Belgrade around 20 ms, and Frankfurt around 40–45 ms. This places Bucharest within the Central European latency envelope for most practical purposes, making it a viable location for services targeting Southeastern EU users who want sub-20 ms local response times and EU-compliant hosting jurisdiction.
We operate two probe nodes in Romania. The first is in Bacău (northeastern Romania) on AS214062 via ITITAN HOSTING / Telesystem. The second is in Bucharest on AS200651 via FlokiNET. These nodes represent different geographic and network positions within Romania. Bacău is in the northeast, reflecting conditions for users in Moldova-border regions and northeastern Romania. Bucharest reflects the capital's IX-connected infrastructure. Running checks across both nodes gives a view of intra-country routing variation rather than just a single Bucharest-centric perspective.